Verizon’s decision is similar to T-Mobile’s contractual changes in 2013.
“A while back, they eliminated subscriptions and contract limitations,” said Noel Greis, co-director of the Center for Logistics and Enterprise Development at UNC’s Kenan-Flagler Business School. “In fact, I was one of the people who switched from Verizon to T-Mobile because of that.”
Despite the increase in upfront cost, she said additional charges were being incorporated in customers’ contracts.
“It wasn’t like Verizon was giving away the iPhone for free,” Greis said.
David Ardia, an assistant professor at the UNC School of Law, said the cost of phones without contracts might be cheaper in the long run.
“Studies have shown that American consumers pay more over the life of the contract for the cost of the hardware than they would if they purchased the hardware at the front end on their own,” Ardia said.
This model without contracts has long existed outside of the country — without the subsidies that U.S. companies offer their patrons.
“It’s our view that this is the way it’s done, but in other places, consumers expect to purchase the phone separate from its contract,” he said.