“I don’t think you can deny the hostility and the latent racial undertones that characterize the whole controversy of the monument,” said Shelby Dawkins-Law, a Ph.D. student in the School of Education and former president of the Graduate and Professional Student Federation.
Dawkins-Law posted on Overheard at UNC to bring attention to people misusing the monument. She said there is a difference between contemplating the memorial and using it as merely a bench.
“I’m glad that there was backlash because it proves that there is a problem,” Dawkins-Law said. “It proves that there is a lot of anger and animosity and really tense feelings on both sides.”
Thomas Bythell, an arborist at UNC, said he worked closely with artist Do-Ho Suh and believes the piece was intended to be interactive.
“He wanted it to be a resting place,” Bythell said.
Bythell also posted on the Overheard at UNC page, in defense of the functionality of the monument.
“I think (the monument) signifies that the foundation of this University was built by the people it was intended to honor,” he said. “And nothing is as strong as its foundation.”
Suh also has artwork on display at the Ackland Art Museum. The piece, titled Floor, features plastic figurines holding up a sheet of glass on which visitors can walk, the Ackland’s Public Programs Manager Allison Portnow said.