A federal judge ruled that the redistricting of Greensboro's City Council by the N.C. General Assembly was unconstitutional last Monday.
The district court judge, Catherine Eagles, ruled in favor of the city of Greensboro, saying the redistricting was unconstitutional under the one person, one vote principle.
The one person, one vote principle requires all votes to carry equal weight — and is violated when a state places voters into electoral districts of materially different population size for no legitimate reason, according to Eagles' ruling.
Allison Riggs, a senior attorney at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, said the General Assembly populated districts unevenly for a Republican advantage.
“(Eagles) was looking at the facts of the case, that it’s illegitimate when some people’s votes carry more weight than others,” Riggs said. “It’s illegitimate to do that for partisan advantage.”
Eagles also ruled against a law the General Assembly passed in 2015, which prohibited the citizens of Greensboro from participating in municipal initiatives or referendums.
Greensboro was the only municipality in North Carolina that restricted its citizens to seek an initiative or referendum.
Eagles ruled against this law on the basis that it bans Greensboro’s residents' rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Riggs said that in the past six years, the General Assembly has tried to pass numerous redistricting plans that have been invalidated in courts.