The makeup of the NC General Assembly is a bit odd on the surface given North Carolina is considered by many to be a swing state. But from a historical lens, the difference between North Carolina’s local representatives and its national stances are nothing new.
Benjamin Waterhouse, associate professor of history at UNC, said political parties used to be more determined by region rather than ideology, and the Republican Party was historically weak in the South.
“Especially from before the Civil War until the 1960s and even afterward, the Democratic Party was mostly the only game in town throughout much of the South,” Waterhouse said. “It’s referred to as the ‘Solid South.’ There were Republicans, but they weren’t very powerful.”
In the 100 years following the Civil War, many southerners saw the Republicans as the party of President Abraham Lincoln — and who brought on the ‘War of Northern Aggression.’ Waterhouse said that Southern Democrats had their roots in the ideals of white supremacy and that loyalty to their party had less to do with political ideology than the idea that the other party was inherently wrong.
This reasoning remained intact until southern white supremacists disagreed with their party’s leader: Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson. Waterhouse said that historians still talk about the day President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and remarked to an aide that he had delivered the South to the Republicans for a generation.
“Some people have commented that he really was off because he delivered it for multiple generations,” Waterhouse said.
But it took North Carolina state politics until the early 1990s for Republicans to gain enough traction to win a governor’s race or a majority in a legislative chamber, said Mitch Kokai, spokesperson for the John Locke Foundation.
Gerrymandering has helped both parties keep their power throughout history.