The accrediting agency made its ruling some time ago — and now the NCAA Committee on Infractions' decision marks the end of a very public, six-year process.
But the decision does not undermine the experiences of those who coached, played and studied with an investigation looming overhead.
“You’re happy that’s it’s over,” head football coach Larry Fedora said to reporters on Saturday. “But I mean, don’t think that we haven’t been penalized.”
Setting athletics aside, the academic integrity of the University was called into question by regulatory bodies. The status of alumni was made a matter of public discourse.
“I was more pissed that something I worked hard for was being questioned,” Jawad Williams, a member of UNC’s 2005 national championship men’s basketball team, said in a tweet. “My degree meant more to my family than the banner, that was extra.”
The lack of concrete or any sanctions assigned to the University has left some incredulous, frustrated the NCAA acknowledged academic improprieties but could not address them through adherence to its bylaws.
Gary Parrish, a CBS college basketball analyst, questioned the role of the NCAA after the COI dealt out its decision on the UNC case.
“If your system won't allow you to punish a school caught doing what UNC was doing, your system is broken,” Parrish said in a tweet.
Stewart Mandel, editor of The All-American, an online sports publication, expressed his bemusement at the infractions process. He cited a particular passage as demonstrating just how "low UNC was willing to go in its defense strategy."