Don't get me wrong. I'm not giving up my job, which I love.
Rather, my title.
I'd always heard others with my job refer to themselves as "reader representatives" and "public editors," but I never liked either. Reader representative sounds too formal; public editor sounds as if I have editorial control over the content of the paper, which I don't, aside from my own column.
And then my mentor, Chuck Stone, told me of his time as the "readers' advocate" at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
That title captured exactly what I have tried for the last semester to live up to, and what I will continue to be until my graduation in May.
Over the last semester, many of you have shared with me your comments and criticisms of the paper.
In cases of mistakes and inaccuracies, I am quick to phone the newsroom and alert the editors.
These calls might evoke groans and such questions as "What did we do this time?" (Once in the fall, I had to phone in a correction because of a mistake I had made when referring to the number of times the DTH has won/been nominated for a Pacemaker.)
Other times, your concerns are more serious. In these situations, I might suggest a letter to the editor or a guest opinion column.