New accusations and the threat of student congressional oversight of Carolina Athletic Association Cabinet appointments have angered CAA members and prompted vehement denials of impropriety.
"We don't have anything to hide," said CAA President Tee Pruitt on Wednesday.
"But it's ridiculously hideous for (Congress) to think they can do that," he said, referring to a bill passed Tuesday by Congress' Rules and Judiciary Committee that would make the CAA's procedures subject to Congress' approval. "The necessary check is through the spring election cycle."
Congress members drew up the legislation in response to recent concerns about CAA's possible misconduct.
Full Congress will vote on the bill next Tuesday, along with two resolutions to censure Pruitt and other top CAA officials.
CAA External Relations Director Rachel Goodman also said she is displeased with the turn of events. "It's personally upsetting to me because I know so many people on CAA have worked for the student body, and those rumors and lies are just a horrible compensation," she said. "I can see why student government would respond, but there's nothing we're covering up, so there's nothing for them to find."
CAA Chief of Staff Greg Rocco said criticism of the organization is unfair. "Everyone has already made up their minds that we're crooks," he said.
But Board of Elections Vice Chairman Fred Hill said he is sticking by assertions he made before Congress' Student Affairs Committee on Tuesday night that the CAA president receives 40 to 60 purely discretionary tickets to each basketball game and that ticket distributions for regular season basketball games and the ACC championship were conducted improperly.
The Daily Tar Heel has been unable to confirm or deny Hill's claims with the ticket office.