It's only been less than a month since I returned to the U.S. after my two years of mandatory military service in Korea, and I can already feel that America's fear of national threat is much greater than what I've seen via world CNN. And I can totally empathize with the grounds of such deep fear, having fulfilled my share of national defense. But I did not realize the extent at which America's struggle to preserve national security would affect me: an international student who studies English, enjoys American music, photography and McDonalds.
Having returned from a Sunday afternoon photo-escapade around campus, I found myself astonished at the e-mail from the chancellor; amidst many lines, phrases "UNC cooperates," "provide access to personal e-mail correspondents of international students" and "requests by law enforcement agencies" popped out. Personally, I consider the U.S. as my second home, and I share the concerns. But I feel deep remorse to have given my attachments to a nation with many admirable qualities, which will negate me at convenience, and yet anger to be notified of the forfeit of a certain right of mine because my passport is not American.
Can there be any greater reclusive stereotypes than to label all humans except Americans as potential terrorists? Can someone explain to me the details of how the school intends to "cautiously handle requests by law enforcement agencies" while "protecting students' privacy and civil rights?"
At the rate new bills and systems to reinforce national security, at the cost of freedom, is being introduced, I wonder what will happen down the road. And I'm not going to say it because I'm afraid it's going to become true.
Pat Kim
Junior
English
The length rule was waived.
