The Washington Post reported that the explosion left pools of blood and debris around the cafeteria and charred some walls. Wires dangled from spots in the ceiling where tiles and insulation were blown to shreds. Shoes and blood-drenched clothing littered the area.
A year ago, on an otherwise beautiful Tuesday morning, our University awoke to one of the worst days in our nation's history. Immediately after the attacks, campus life took on a strange duality. There seemed to be two worlds: one inside on our television sets, where everything appeared to be falling apart, and another outside on the walkways of Polk and McCorkle places, where almost nothing seemed to have changed at all.
The bombing at Hebrew University violated that sanctuary of learning, destroying its ivory tower in the amount of time it took to detonate an explosive with a cell phone.
Meanwhile, over the past year in Chapel Hill, cell phones have continued going off in class, bars have kept on buzzing with activity, and life has churned on with beautiful regularity.
While a year ago we felt like students at Hebrew University, we'd really never been further from it. In last week's State of the University Address, Chancellor James Moeser best described the attacks' impact on our campus when he said they altered the context of everything around us. Our sanctuary of learning has mercifully remained a sanctuary.
Despite being blessed by our disconnect from last year's horror, it creates a problem.
How can those of us who have no personal ties to the attacks successfully mourn from this peaceful environment those who died?
What can we possibly know of the pain of watching the towers collapse on television while knowing that a loved one was inside? Or of the heroism of the rescue workers who died a year ago? Every time I try to imagine, I fear that I'm drifting into sentimentality, experiencing the catharsis that comes with grief without the pain that should precede it.
Are we just phonies?