The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Pit Preacher Spreads Gospel of Popularity, Not True Religion

But it wasn't him. It was another less-colorful preacher -- a term being used loosely -- telling people why they are sinners and how they can fix it. And of course there was the usual opponent trying to out-yell him. I asked a guy next to me how many pit preachers we need. He answered that one was enough for him.

Needless to say, Wednesday I witnessed the same thing -- preacher number three.

As a supporter of free speech, I respect the right for people to spread their opinions and religious hoopla. Just because I respect these preachers' right to relay their messages, however, doesn't mean I have figured out the value of their messages yet.

It's doubtful that their rhetoric changes people's religious ideas, as most people are set in their religious ways. Those who agree with these preachers, likely not many, listen in support of the message. Those who disagree often listen for entertainment. Some choose to ignore them, and others don't care. These preachers probably know all this -- they just love the limelight.

Because religions are left to interpretation, it is often impossible to convince another what right and wrong is. This room for interpretation also leads to the development of radical and over-exaggerated personalities. Many agree that the Pit Preacher does more to repel people than to attract them.

Few things are scarier than religion taken too far, and many of these preachers do take their interpretations too far. For example, most of Birdsong's speech is about hating people of different races, religions and sexual orientations. He embraces sexism and has no tolerance for multiple groups. I doubt that a person in search of true religious awakening would embrace these. If recruiting followers is a preacher's usual goal, then what is Birdsong's motive?

Birdsong has become a local superstar because of his views, and most people don't consider him a threat.

But sometimes religious interpretation can be dangerous. The terrorists in the World Trade Center attack vividly demonstrated this. Reading too much into the Quran, Bible or any other religious text can lead to extreme outcomes.

Ironically, Birdsong is a mirror image of the World Trade bombers he loves to hate. He has repeatedly used the bombers to bash Islam -- despite that the bombers were not truly practicing Islam. They do not represent true Muslims, and Birdsong's representation of true Christians is just as shaky.

Often people label these characters as representing their religions in extreme forms. That is false. It is essential that people understand these characters are not extremists but have twisted existing religions to suit their extreme ideologies.

Nowhere in the Quran is killing innocent people condoned, and nowhere in the Bible is hating people who read the former condoned.

Interestingly, I've been compared to Birdsong. In a letter to the editor, someone claimed I am just as extreme. That's doubtful. I've also been informed that he has used one of my columns as the basis of one his sermons. That is not as doubtful. For the record, neither bothers me. I suppose only in America could a black feminist college student be directly compared to a white chauvinist elderly preacher.

Birdsong's celebrity status and this eruption of new preachers demonstrates just how important religion still is in America. Fortunately, most people still use religion to uplift their lives instead of a means to spread hate.

It would be very interesting to know how many of these preachers see the irony of going to the same hell they claim everyone else is going to.

E-mail Tiffanie Drayton at drayton@email.unc.edu.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Special Print Edition
The Daily Tar Heel's 2024 DEI Special Edition