The Oct. 11 editorial entitled "A Gift for Posterity" has marked the beginning of debate and discussion over a class gift, and we as senior class officers warmly encourage everyone to engage in this annual tradition.
The editorial presents its argument against two gift options: a $20,000 library endowment and a special needs scholarship of the same amount.
It then supports the option of a glass etching in the Campus Y, which will memorialize our campus response to Sept. 11, 2001, only to find great fault in this option as well.
However, the editorial failed to reveal the pertinence and reason behind each gift option while also neglecting integral facts behind each.
One must keep in mind that the purpose of the annual senior class gift is to give back to our University and leave our campus a better place. Given our University's budget crisis, we felt that our class gift should particularly be of some direct financial assistance rather than creating just a physical monument.
With that said, each class of 2003 gift option will clearly make Carolina a better place and reflect on the character of our class.
The Undergraduate Library endowment is intended to keep our new library new. Its intentions are noble and aim to improve the academic climate of Carolina. To state that this duty "falls squarely on the shoulders of the state legislature" is not realistic because it is private donations that make our library great in the first place -- paying for all interior design and furniture.
If we rely solely on the state legislature to fund the library, the Undergrad would be anything but new in 10, 20 or 30 years.
Moreover, The Daily Tar Heel editorial board failed to mention that the gift also includes quotes on all benches in front of the library, which the seniors will be able to choose along with a plaque recognizing all those who contributed.