Republicans have accused Democrats of keeping the session open to have the option to redraw legislative districts before new legislators take their seats in January, possibly shifting control to the Republicans.
"There's no question they have a hidden agenda that's not so hidden," said Senate Minority Leader Patrick Ballantine, R-New Hanover.
By not closing the special redistricting session, Democrats would not have to seek Gov. Mike Easley's approval to continue business -- including redistricting -- before the opening of the 2003 session.
Rep. Sam Ellis, R-Wake, questioned the continuance of the special session, stating that it was unnecessary because districts were set by the state Supreme Court months ago. "(The continuance) was more trickery," said Ellis, adding that the meeting is no more than a "shadow session."
Legislative leaders redrew the district lines in 2001, which they must do every 10 years, and Republicans -- claiming the districts were illegal under the N.C. Constitution -- took Democrats to court over the new boundaries.
Superior Court Judge Knox Jenkins redrew the lines in May for the 2002 election but ruled that the 2003 legislature had to redraw the lines once session begins in January.
Tony Rand, D-Cumberland, N.C. Senate majority leader, said Democrats decided to continue a special redistricting session started in April under N.C. Attorney General Roy Cooper's advice.
House Speaker Jim Black, D-Mecklenburg, said Democrats have a case pending with the N.C. Supreme Court over the district lines and that Cooper advised them to stay in session until the legal matter is resolved.
Bill Gilkeson, an analyst at the research division of the N.C. General Assembly, said that even if Democrats were able to redraw lines in special session, Republicans would likely take the plans to court.