Funding for the $3.8 million used by the Chapel Hill Transit system is provided by student fees, the department transit tax and UNC's parking system.
While committee members agreed that the transit system is valuable, they did not come to a consensus as to whether continuing to use parking permit fees to pay for the transit system is justified.
"The University has to find a way to pay for transit," said Eugene Bober, committee member and planner in the School of Medicine. "But it doesn't have to come from parking."
"I don't like the sin-tax flavor of this," said Todd Peterson, committee member and executive vice president and chief operating officer of UNC Hospitals.
He said the burden of transit fees should be shifted from students, faculty and staff who park on campus to both University and hospital employers.
"Most of our competitor employers offer free parking," Peterson said. "This is not realistic, but hardly any of our competitors charge their employees for transit."
He said that because less than one-quarter of hospital employees live in areas served by the transit system, it is not reasonable to expect those employees to pay for the transit system.
"Transit ought to be supported on its own merits," Peterson said, suggesting the use of parking fine revenues, not parking permits, to subsidize transit fees.
But Tammy McHale, senior associate dean of finance and planning, said that although people who park on campus subsidize the cost of others riding the bus, public transportation helps free up parking spaces.