Distinguished scholars representing far-off countries such as New Zealand, Germany, the Netherlands, England, Russia and Australia came to UNC-Chapel Hill this weekend to discuss whether countries should apologize for foreign-policy decisions.
The State Apologies Conference, hosted by the University Center for International Studies, brought participants from across the globe to discuss past examples of apologies, as well as future possibilities and trends.
"The purpose (of the conference) is to try to get a better understanding of this phenomenon of states apologizing," said Niklaus Steiner, executive director of the international studies center. "Does it matter anything? Is it only words? How do we measure the sincerity of a government?"
Mark Gibney, professor of political science at UNC-Asheville, and Rhoda Howard-Hassmann, a human rights expert at Wilfrid Laurier University in Canada, also helped organize the conference.
The scholars' papers, which were the topics of discussion, will be compiled into a book funded by the United Nations and published by the U.N. University Press.
The convention explored an international issue that scholars said has yet to be analyzed sufficiently.
"You think apologies should follow aberrations and not after normal course of foreign policy, when it is being played according to the rules of the game," said Carlos Parodi, professor at Illinois State University, during one of the open discussion sessions.
"I argue the opposite; really abhorrable things happen just because of foreign policy (and) treaties. Should a nation then apologize for its foreign policy?"
Participants discussed subjects ranging from the need for President Bush to properly apologize for abuse in Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison to corporate apologies for apartheid in South Africa and the role of public apology in international law.