The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Sunday, Sept. 29, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Student officials debate openness of meetings

In the wake of debate over Adrian Johnston’s nomination for student body vice president, a few students have placed increased scrutiny on student government proceedings.

Tonight, Student Congress will re-examine Johnston’s appointment, which failed to garner approval during a contentious meeting last week.

Congress members wrangled over the nomination process, paying particular attention to the closed meetings of the committee that chose top applicants from which Student Body President-elect Seth Dearmin made his appointments.

A few students have railed against the secrecy of such proceedings, questioning whether N.C. statutes or the Student Code should dictate operations.

But student government leaders said there is no solid precedent for open meetings of the selection committee, which filters applications for student body officer posts.

Student Solicitor General Matt Liles said student government uses the state’s open meetings law as a guide: The nature of the body determines if a meeting is open or closed. As UNC is a public institution, it’s implied that student government proceedings should be open to the student body, Liles said.

The Code stipulates that meetings of the executive branch and its constituent committees are open. But the selection committee is not technically part of the executive branch because it includes members from all three branches of student government.

Student Body President Matt Calabria served on the committee and said the group closed the meeting on the basis of three factors — preventing bad blood, averting increased political pressure on committee members and ensuring that too many people didn’t weigh in.

“The legitimate process requires that we don’t talk about it,” he said.

To ensure that the committee was in the right, Calabria spoke with University legal counsel. Legal advisers instructed student government officials that the committee did not meet all four state criteria to be considered a public body.

“These meetings have always been closed,” Calabria said. “It was clearly the will of everybody in the room that the committee be closed.”

But Carolina Athletic Association Treasurer Ginny Franks, who submitted a request for the information discussed during committee meetings, said debate about the meeting should center on the Code — not N.C. law. “I think student government is hiding behind legal services’ interpretations of N.C. statutes. They are experts on N.C. law, but the Student Code is what applies here.”

Contact the University Editor at udesk@unc.edu.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Special Print Edition
The Daily Tar Heel's 2024 DEI Special Edition