Officials at UNC-Chapel Hill have begun discussions of a possible change in the way student grade point averages are calculated.
Continuing national concerns about grade inflation prompted the Educational Policy Committee, a subcommittee of the UNC-CH Faculty Council, to look more closely at ways of curbing the problem.
The committee is still in the early stages of a debate about whether any action should be taken to correct a measurable increase in the percentage of A's awarded at the University, said Peter Gordon, committee chairman and psychology professor at UNC-CH.
"We have begun to explore techniques that give an alternative to the traditional grade point average," Gordon said.
One system being considered would continue to use standard letter grades but also would account for the difficulty of the courses students select and the grading practices of their professors, he said.
"I make the comparison, and it should be a loose comparison, of it to the RPI that's used in college sports," Gordon said, referring to the concept of a Relative Power Index. "You don't just look at the win-loss of the team, you also look at the difficulty of the schedule."
Such a system could benefit students taking difficult classes with harder professors, he said.
"Right now all the incentive for students is to get higher grades regardless of really what that reflects," Gordon said.
"An A in the class where everyone gets an A is the same as an A in the class where only five people get an A."