The UNC-system Association of Student Governments has a lot more work to do, judging from its recent recommendations for the Four Year Tuition Plan.
ASG President Atul Bhula says he gave no input on tuition at the Board of Governors meeting last week because he was waiting on his tuition task force’s findings.
So one might have expected something powerful to justify the wait.
To be fair, their ideas are sensible — in fact, many correspond to the suggestions we published last week.
They suggest keeping the cap on increases, allowing campuses the flexibility to plan independently and avoiding charging tuition by credit hour, among other ideas.
But it is not what is said that concerns us; it is what these recommendations lack.
The document does not discuss the effect of tuition changes on students, which Bhula has emphasized in the past.
There is also no discussion of the rationale by which these conclusions were reached.
And there is certainly no clear evidence of input from different campuses.