A flurry of complaints citing illegal campaign practices came in the immediate aftermath of the Tuesday candidates meeting in what is shaping up to be one of the most litigious starts to student body election season in recent memory.
Of the eight complaints submitted to the Board of Elections, all but two are against student body president candidate Rick Ingram who, for the second time in the young election season, is under investigation for allegedly violating campaign rules.
“It’s a little bit ridiculous,” Ingram said. “We were all doing it. I don’t understand what the Board of Elections is trying to do with all this.”
Ingram’s campaign, which was cleared of any wrongdoing following the first investigation, now faces four counts of premature dorm petitioning, one count of improper public campaigning and one count of so-called “Dean-Doming.” The complaints allege improper petitioning for signatures Tuesday night in residence halls and during the basketball game against Clemson University, as the campaigns sought out the 1,250 unique signatures required for a position on the Feb. 8 ballot.
Student body president candidate Mary Cooper was also accused of soliciting signatures inside the Smith Center during Tuesday’s game.
The board stated at its meeting Wednesday that it would not punish campaigns that attempted to acquire signatures at the game since it had not clearly stated that it was impermissible.
The board informed candidates at the declaration meeting Tuesday night that dorm-storming — the practice of gaining signatures by going door-to-door in residence halls — could not begin before Wednesday at 7 p.m. Dean-Doming was subsequently prohibited at the Wednesday meeting.
Ingram said he did not remember the board stating that dorm-storming was prohibited until Wednesday at the meeting.
Cooper said the board made it clear twice during the meeting when dorm-storming could begin.?“We all know the rules,” she said. “I trust that all campaigns are trying to keep a level playing field.”