TO THE EDITOR:
I’m dismayed by the myopic view of equality suggested by a recent item on this page. January 11’s letter entitled “Term ‘manholes’ advances a misogynistic culture” wrongly takes issue with the use of a commonly accepted aspect of the English language.
The author insists that reforming a gender-loaded term that, he himself admits, has a “ubiquitous presence” in daily life will yield some benefit to equality in the workforce. While his belief might contain some scintilla of truth, it largely misses the boat. It would do more harm than good.
Quick fixes as simple as altering the word “manhole” will not in itself solve the world’s gender divisions. Sloppy constructions like “ladyholes” serve to only exacerbate a greater concern.
“Ladyholes” is not a solution. It is a problem.
Rape culture describes a culture in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media condone, normalize, excuse, or encourage sexualized violence. While the “ladyhole” construction may seem inclusive, novel or even enlightened, in the wrong hands it can present real danger.
In our sexualized and body-obsessed society, we must limit our loosely pornographic references. Even at the possible cost of excluding a portion of society from septic maintenance. Unnecessary use of “lady” and “hole” in close proximity will allow ample opportunity for tasteless vaginal imagery. Uses and expressions that construe women as little more than objects to be entered.
Forced alteration of flawed language is not a prudent first step. It merely furthers our problems.
John Dougherty
Graduate Student
School of Law
