“It’s not going to be heavy-handed enforcement.”
Baldwin said first offenders will be issued a written warning while second offenders will be issued a citation and a $50 fine.
She said she wasn’t sure how the police department would keep track of the number of first-time smoking offenses.
In 2009 new legislation granted cities the power to designate non-smoking areas. A statewide smoking ban in restaurants and bars already exists.
Bronson Frick, associate director of Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights, said bans in other states have not required much intervention.
“The reaction from other communities around the country is that these policies are popular and work well,” he said.
Frick emphasized the need for signs to assure compliance.
“Signs are important so that the people know that the policies are in place,” he said.
“Otherwise it is hard to comply if people aren’t aware that it exists.”
An estimated 400 signs will be needed, said Diane Sauer, director of the City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department.
If a grant cannot be secured, funding for the signs will come from Parks and Recreation’s allocated funds.
Local business owner and Raleigh resident George Hoffman said he disagrees with the ban.
To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.
“If you are going to put a law on the books, put a law on the books that makes sense,” he said.
Hoffman, who has owned Pipes by George on Hillsborough Street since 1975, said the parks’ littering problem comes from litter other than cigarettes.
UNC students and regular flagpole smokers echoed Hoffman’s sentiment.
“If it’s littering, then the law should be about littering and not smoking,” said Alauna Safarpour, a junior history and political science major.
Sophomore Tyler Fletcher said he was concerned about people’s misconceptions of secondhand smoke.
“It is not an issue outdoors,” he said.
Contact the State & National Editor at state@dailytarheel.com.