It’s always good to start the year on a positive note.
Especially this year.
Last year left many of us with a bad taste in our mouths, and it didn’t get much better during the summer.
All year, the looming threat of budget cuts cast a dark cloud over campus. Faculty salaries remained frozen and departments braced for cuts of 5, then 10, then 15 percent, only to have the University saddled with a whopping 18 percent when all was said and done.
To add insult to injury, the football team’s promising season was sidelined by an NCAA investigation and allegations of serious wrongdoing.
All the while, University leaders seemed intent on keeping the public out the loop, consistently reverting to secrecy and silence whenever trouble hit. At a school Charles Kuralt once characterized as the “university of the people,” this strategy is counterproductive to discussion, change and almost every lofty ideal necessary to maintain the level of excellency we are accustomed to.
Unfortunately, this attitude has lingered into the fall of 2011.
The most recent case involves replacing Dick Mann, the vice chancellor for finance and administration. The names of finalists to replace him are being kept secret, stopping members of the UNC community from having any input in the process or decision. And officials have said the cost of the search firm is “unavailable” at the moment.
This penchant for secrecy is new to searches, but it is frighteningly familiar on other fronts. When the University wouldn’t release information related to the NCAA football investigation, it forced the DTH and several other media outlets to file an open records lawsuit, which, for the University, became an ugly court battle and a waste of time, resources and good will. Both the trial and appeals courts ruled mostly in favor of the media. In spite of their legal losses, UNC administrators do not seem to have learned their lesson in the importance of transparency and cooperation.