The Interview is an opinion page series featuring extended interviews of people who affect our community, written by members of the editorial board. Today, Maggie Zellner writes about Student Attorney General Jon McCay.
Jon McCay certainly looks the part of attorney general, sitting across from me in a collared shirt, speaking in the measured manner of someone who has spent countless hours giving closing statements and preparing cross-examinations. If we weren’t sitting five feet away from the Pit, it would be easy to forget that McCay is a student here, too.
At first blush, McCay seems to take a hard line. “When a student plagiarizes, they haven’t just violated their professor’s standards,” he said. “It’s bigger than that — they’ve violated the standards of the community.”
By that logic, the professors who decide not to report violations to the honor system are putting their own standards above the community’s. In its own way, that too is a violation of the Honor Code.
In capitalizing on recent controversy surrounding the honor system, a small but vocal crowd of discontented professors is missing the bigger picture.
That picture includes the buttoned-up McCay, whose serious demeanor comes from respect for an institution that itself is actually quite unconventional. At UNC, it is students who charge, prosecute, defend and sentence their peers who are accused of violating the Honor Code.
Few universities entrust this responsibility entirely to students, and it’s hardly child’s play. At UNC, those accused of violating the Honor Code are considered innocent until proven guilty — and the burden of proof is high.
This may not seem revolutionary; it is, after all, how we expect real courts to work. But many colleges’ discipline systems look downright draconian compared to UNC’s. Ours, in McCay’s words, sees its role as “investigating the facts and trying to find the truth.”
So why, then, given such admirable aims, has UNC’s honor system been the target of so much criticism of late?