After months of closed-room debate, a committee appointed by Congress to reduce the federal budget has failed — triggering automatic cuts and potentially reducing university research funding.
The committee’s failure to reach an agreement will trigger a $1.2 trillion cut to the federal budget, which includes the agencies that supply grants to researchers.
The research budget at UNC relies heavily on federal funds, which make up more than 70 percent of the University’s $788 million total. Other public universities are similarly dependent, especially on agencies like the National Institutes of Health.
Private universities are not immune to potential cuts, either. Of Duke University’s $900 million research budget, $550 million comes from the federal government.
The committee, comprised of six Republicans, who refused to levy higher taxes, and six Democrats, who balked from substantially changing entitlement programs, reached a stalemate Monday night and announced they would not be able to make a decision by the Wednesday deadline.
U.S. Rep. David Price, D-N.C., who wrote a joint letter to the supercommittee in defense of education funding, said the trigger cuts were less desirable than a committee recommendation.
“There could be another bite out of the apple for education and research,” he said. “But not all cuts are created equal, and we need to make investments for our future.”
Universities are already planning an advocacy campaign to lobby against heavy cuts to education-related agencies, said Melissa Vetterkind, the director of federal relations at Duke.
But the impact of the automatic cuts to federal research funds is still uncertain. The House Appropriations Committee will decide where to make specific cuts before they go into effect in 2013, and the 2012 elections could change that process.