In the week since her Feb. 19 appointment, incoming Student Attorney General Amanda Claire Grayson has been ironing out her plans for the honor system.
Grayson will manage a staff of about 50 volunteer counsels who defend and prosecute cases of Honor Court violations.
Tuesday, she sat down with opinion editor Maggie Zellner to explain what she thinks the role of the honor system is at UNC and what students and faculty need to know about it.
Daily Tar Heel: The attorney general’s office is sort of the last stop. What happens before then? How does someone end up with an honor offense?
Amanda Claire Grayson: It’s hard for me to believe that people set out to cheat, or set out to disobey the Honor Code. People don’t say, ‘I’m going to plagiarize this paper.’ They pull an all-nighter and they get freaked out and they take a couple shortcuts when they’re writing notes and think they’re not going to get caught. Even with the most egregious violations, it doesn’t mean the student is a bad person.
DTH: There seem to be a lot of faculty, or at least a vocal minority, who don’t really understand what you do. What would you say to them?
ACG: The most basic thing to understand is that we deal with the Honor Code violations that are reported to us, and we process these cases from beginning to end. We represent students and we represent the University. We try to get to a mutually agreeable outcome, an outcome that we think is the truth about what happened.
DTH: And then what? What do you hope to see happen after you’ve gotten to the truth, or some approximation of it?
ACG: The process has several goals. One of them is correcting the behavior and using this an educational opportunity — for students to learn from their mistakes and take responsibility for their actions. But it’s also to punish the behavior in line with our sense that the University has been wronged and the offense needs to be punished. Not just to correct the behavior, but also to prevent it from happening again.