The University’s fraternity system considered only one disciplinary case in 2011 — an exceptional drop from the year before, prompting the system’s judiciary board to change the rules.
The Greek Judicial Board, which is responsible for holding the 21 fraternity chapters in the Interfraternity Council accountable to the Greek Alcohol Policy and other IFC policies, heard 11 cases in 2010.
These cases consisted of early and dry recruitment violations, hazing charges and common source container violations.
Fraternity leaders recently rewrote bylaws to require a preponderance of evidence to prosecute fraternity chapters, IFC President Jack Partain said.
This means Greek chapters can more easily be found to be guilty. According to the new law, they can be disciplined if they “more likely than not” committed a violation, instead of “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
“After the bylaws were written (in 2010), they were written with a bad burden of proof,” Partain said. “We weren’t able to prosecute issues that needed to be prosecuted.”
Partain referred to a summer recruiting violation that took place last year. He said the old bylaws’ burden of proof was too high and therefore the incident did not result in a sanction from the Greek judicial board.
“We realized that was a problem,” he said. “It was not an effective system.”
During the summer of 2010, the IFC worked with alumni to rewrite the Greek judicial board bylaws.