Reform of the University’s honor system is still in its early stages, but administrators and student leaders say the scope of the changes will be broad.
The honor system task force, which was created in the fall to reform the system, will divide discussion into three categories: the system’s history, attitudes about it and peer systems.
At Monday’s meeting of the task force, members said many aspects of the system are on the table for change, with an emphasis on simplification.
Katie Turner, administrative assistant in the Office of Faculty Governance, said the system needs to enhance transparency.
“What we’re talking about is academic integrity, getting people to buy into the system,” Turner said.
During the next two weeks, members of the task force will look at procedural issues.
Amanda Claire Grayson, the incoming student attorney general, pointed to the example of types of misconduct that need to be addressed by both the Honor Court and campus or town police.
“With conduct cases, there is a concurrent criminal case,” Grayson said. “That can cause an honor system case to be delayed as long as nine months.”
Dean of Students Jonathan Sauls said simplicity is important.