The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Friday, Nov. 1, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

A lack of transparency: Administrative silence sends a loud, negative message.

Administrators could use The Daily Tar Heel as a means for communication with students, but recent fraud within a University department has created a barrier between all parties.

In the wake of irregularities found in the teaching and oversight practices in the African and Afro-American studies department, many University officials have told the DTH they can’t answer reporters’ questions.

Chancellor Holden Thorp did release the University’s report and review of the African and Afro-American studies department. A University spokesman said, “The chancellor felt strongly that transparency and accountability were essential.”

If this is the transparency the University promised, it’s simply not enough.

The newspaper’s primary aim to this point has been to find out how the University plans to handle the repercussions a state investigation into the fraud might entail for UNC.

As a student publication, we are especially concerned with how the fraud will affect the University’s image.

But questions have been ignored or circumvented.

A DTH reporter called numerous administrators and officials. Many redirected her to previous statements made by other officials.

When asked what the investigation would mean for students, an administrator responded with no comment.

When asked how the University is handling publicity related to the investigation, an official said, “Chancellor Thorp prefers not to say anything while the investigation is pending.” Our reporter was then re-directed to several news articles.

Administrators should communicate their plans in handling this situation.

Transparency also requires a more timely result.

On Nov. 7, a DTH reporter made a public records request for grade distributions in all AFAM classes for academic years 2006 through 2011. The request was received by the University Nov. 10, but due to backlog, has yet to be filled.

When the value of students’ degrees — and UNC’s reputation — is on the line, it’s imperative that the University communicates how it will handle the situation.

Our requests from the University are extensive but not inappropriate. We want to know what this investigation means for students and UNC.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.