Recent developments bring new momentum to the investigation of the worst academic scandal at UNC in memory — a scandal that affects the value of each student’s education.
It started during the 2010 NCAA investigation into the football program concerning improper benefits, in which it was revealed that several athletes had received improper academic help from a tutor.
Since UNC administrators have failed to cooperate every step of the way and reveal the truth, the student body should hold them accountable and demand that they do.
A year passed before administrators commissioned an internal review of the Department of African and Afro-American Studies which looked only as far back as 2007. The review’s report, released in May, raised more questions than answers.
The report revealed that former department chairman Julius Nyang’oro and Deborah Crowder, a former department administrator, had a hand in creating 54 courses that were either irregularly taught, meaning the instructor provided little or no classroom instruction, or “aberrant,” meaning there was no evidence of faculty grading — or both. Of the students enrolled in those courses, 58 percent were athletes.
Another faculty investigation suggested athletic department academic advisors directed student athletes to those courses.
Last week’s discovery of the transcript of former UNC football and basketball player Julius Peppers on a University web portal implies the academic irregularities stemming from courses in the AFAM department extended well before 2007.
The extent of this scandal is uncertain, but the lack of transparency on the part of administrators means students should demand more information.
Today, thousands of freshmen begin their college education. But with the academic scandal, the most basic principles of this community to which we welcome them — honor, academic integrity, the search for truth and all that we sentimentally call “the Carolina Way” — are called into question.
The student body is not responsible for this controversy. But who is to blame is less self-evident.