For Congressional members, politics is their lifestyle — but until recently, many were in support of limiting collegiate research of the subject.
In January, the U.S. Congress repealed past restrictions on National Science Foundation funding for political science research for the 2014 fiscal year.
In 2013, Congress restricted National Science Foundation research funding to only projects that promoted national security or economic interests — a contentious restriction that compelled some representatives from UNC to lobby in Capitol Hill.
Political science professor Frank Baumgartner said many politicians are skeptical of their role as research subjects.
“A lot of politicians don’t like to be a part of studies. There’s a lot of hostility toward the economics and political science,” Baumgartner said.
“Political leaders think that political scientists have some kind of angle.”
He said some politicians don’t see the value of research that is more liberal arts-based.
Baumgartner said it’s not uncommon for Congress to be hostile to the study of political science, and there is more of a focus on scientific, technological, engineering and mathematical research.
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., proposed a bill four years ago trying to eliminate political science funding from the National Science Foundation, which was $10 million, and redistribute $7 million to the National Cancer Institute, Baumgartner said.