U.S. SENATE
Sen. Kay Hagan is neither the perfect senator nor the perfect candidate. But the combination of her record and the dangerous ideas of her opponent is enough for this board to lend her our endorsement.
We believe poverty and economic inequality are the gravest problems afflicting both North Carolina and the country. Hagan’s anti-austerity policies are far better suited to addressing poverty and its attendant problems than those of Rep. Thom Tillis. We view her support of a higher minimum wage as indicative of a real desire to address the needs of the poor.
Hagan has a strong environmental record. Tillis, when asked if he believed climate change was a scientific fact, replied that he did not. In a state facing massive pollution from fracking and agricultural runoff, anyone willing to turn a blind eye is not fit to lead.
Tillis has pledged to spend valuable time and taxpayer money fighting to preserve North Carolina’s ban on same-sex marriage. Any politician willing to fight to the bitter end to protect laws dehumanizing parts of his constituency cannot be trusted to make North Carolina a better place to live.
If elected, Hagan should stick to her progressive guns and continue to take decisive action on behalf of the state’s neediest citizens.
U.S. HOUSE David Price is a proven leader and educator. He should be reelected as the representative for U.S. House District 4. Price is a former public policy professor at Duke University and has served nearly three decades in the House. Price has authored legislation aimed at restructuring campaign finance. He recently named economic recovery and tax code reform as two of his highest priorities. Price’s opponent, Paul Wright, is a lawyer from Mount Olive. Defunding “Obamacare” and fighting “de-Christianization” seem to be his main priorities. David Price is the more qualified candidate. But voters should ask more of the 13-term incumbent — given his seniority, Price has the capacity to be a more active voice in a tumultuous Congress.
U.S. HOUSE Residents of the 6th Congressional District should vote for Laura Fjeld. Her experience as vice president and general counsel of the UNC system will prepare her well to defend education. The state’s modern Republican Party owes its origins to race-baiting. Fjeld’s opponent, Mark Walker, represents a continuation of this tradition. His diatribes against the federal government have ugly roots, as does his emphasis on food stamps, welfare cheats and broken families destroyed by “lavish entitlements.” Walker even touts his visits to the “inner city” of Baltimore, New York and Cleveland. These “once-proud communities,” he laments, are “now addicted to the secular seduction of governmental assistance.” All voters should reject candidates like Walker.