The paper classes in the department boosted 81 students’ grade point averages to the necessary 2.0 to graduate, according to the findings of the Wainstein Report.
“Each paper class grade increased a student’s GPA, on average, by approximately .03 grade points,” the report said.
Rick White, associate vice chancellor for communications, said the University will consult its accrediting agency — the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools — before taking action against the 81 graduates.
“We’re considering options on these matters and are working closely with SACS to evaluate possible courses of action,” he said by email.
Belle Wheelan, the president of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, said she has not yet read the Wainstein report, but said the group will take the necessary actions to evaluate UNC’s accreditation.
“What we will do is we will read the report and check it against our principles,” she said. “If there are things in the report that suggest the University is out of compliance with our principles, we will ask the University to send a report back to show what they are going to get back in compliance.”
The association has core values upon which they base their accreditation. The 804 institutions under its jurisdiction normally go through a reaffirmation process every 10 years with a midway report during the fifth year. These reports are typically reviewed twice a year, but Wheelan said the Wainstein report might necessitate a special review of UNC.
“A 77-person board normally reads in December and June, but we would possibly do a special report for UNC’s new circumstance,” she said.