The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Saturday, Jan. 25, 2025 Newsletters Latest print issue
The Daily Tar Heel

Letter: ?FAC victim of regulatory capture

TO THE EDITOR:

There now seems to be general agreement that UNC’s faculty has not lived up to its responsibility to ensure that all students receive a genuine college education. When it comes to undergraduate athletes like those now in the news, monitoring their education should have been the particular concern of the Faculty Athletics Committee. In fall 2013 that committee announced that it would begin to “participate in the review and monitoring of student-athlete enrollment patterns,” but why did it take so long? How did that committee manage to overlook outright academic fraud spanning some eighteen years?

According to its own description posted on a university website earlier this year, “the committee has created and is following an established plan to ensure consistent, sustainable outcomes and practices as part of a fact-based approach to evaluating the alignment of the University’s academic mission with athletics.” Having the last part of that otherwise unintelligible sentence speak of the “alignment” of the University’s academic mission with athletics rather than the other way around was probably inadvertent. But in point of fact the FAC has indeed let the tail wag the dog. The economist George Stigler won a Nobel Prize for the concept of “regulatory capture,” and that seems to be what has happened here.

Consider the composition of the current committee. The chancellor and the athletic director are ex officio members. The senior associate athletic director and the director of the Academic Support Program for Student Athletes are on the committee as “advisers.” ASPSA representation might sound like a good idea, but the Wainstein report suggests that many employees of that program have been more interested in athletes’ eligibility than their academic progress.

Of the 10 faculty members of the FAC, six are from professional schools that have little involvement, if any, in the education of student athletes; one of them is the committee’s chair, who teaches radiologic sciences in the Department of Medical Allied Health Professions. Only four members of the committee are from the College of Arts and Sciences, where nearly all athletes are enrolled, and although a couple of them seem to have done good work, another was apparently available to help a football player who needed a paper course to raise his GPA.

This isn’t the image that comes to mind when one hears about “faculty oversight” of athletics. We’d be better off without a committee at all than with one that gives the illusion of such supervision without actually providing much of it.

Our newly energized Faculty Council should pay more attention to a committee that supposedly represents the faculty. It should have more members from the College of Arts and Sciences. It should have at least one from the athletics reform group, if only to watch for signs of cooptation. And certainly it should have a chair with something more than an untenured clinical appointment. A committee that oversees an important and sometimes troublesome aspect of the university’s life should be chaired by someone with independence and authority.

A reconstituted Faculty Athletics Committee could be a powerful force for academic integrity. In its current incarnation it has been part of the problem.

John Shelton Reed

Professor Emeritus

Sociology

Madeline G. Levine

Professor Emerita

Slavic Literatures

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Michael H. Hunt

Professor Emeritus History