E ast Chapel Hill High School’s varsity football team has never produced a winning season.
Mike Holderman, who was brought in more or less at the last minute as the program’s third head coach in as many years, said before the season that he was “looking forward to the challenge.”
It’s likely his players were, too — but some challenges just aren’t worth accepting.
On Oct. 17, the Wildcats were forced to forfeit a regular season game against Northern Durham. Two weeks later, the school announced the team’s season was over. It would forfeit its final two contests, ending a season that saw multiple shutout losses by as many as 65 points.
Injuries had depleted an undersized team full of undersized players.
At the high school level, the difference between a rebuilding team and a perennial powerhouse isn’t just daunting. It’s downright dangerous. What danger lurks in having smaller underclassmen knock heads with future Division I players is magnified by players’ lack of skill.
College and professional teams seem far less likely to experience such variance in average roster weights and skill levels.
In October, a New York Times feature provided a national context for the Wildcats’ plight. Forfeiture has become an increasingly common option for high school teams cut down by injury. Whether this is because football is becoming more violent or teams are becoming more adept at identifying injury is unclear, but the growth of forfeiting has nevertheless sparked broader conversations about the ethics of allowing and encouraging boys as young as 14 to place their particularly vulnerable brains in harm’s way.