The question for UNC’s Board of Governors still remains: Why did you fire UNC-system President Tom Ross out of the blue?
Board Chairman John Fennebresque has managed to not provide the public with an inkling of justification for the sacking, stating it had nothing to do with politics, age, performance or even the athletic scandal. There was no identifiable event that precipitated the dismissal either. No reasons for firing Ross add up, especially given how the board did nothing but sing his praises during the announcement.
What we are watching is the firing of a well-respected public official by a politically-appointed board with no single person owning up to forcing the resignation. The arrogance with which the board refuses to provide an answer suggests that external forces hidden from the public’s attention were the basis for the move.
The sacking of Ross is not an isolated incident — it coincides with other attacks on the UNC-system by the board.
For starters, the board passed a resolution in summer 2014 that froze and capped the percent of tuition that can be used to fund need-based financial aid. And this past fall, the board began a review of the 237 centers and institutes across the system in response to the state’s budget.
Results of the review will be announced and voted on at the board’s next meeting on Feb. 27 at UNC-Charlotte.
A group of student organizers from the UNC-Chapel Hill BOG Democracy Coalition met with Fennebresque and Jim Holmes on Monday. At that meeting, Fennebresque claimed that “President Ross and the Board of Governors are on the same page.”