Opposition to Alison Bechdel’s New York Times best-selling graphic novel started after Duke freshman Brian Grasso posted on the school’s class of 2019 Facebook page: “I feel as if I would have to compromise my personal Christian moral beliefs to read it.”
It was the graphic illustration of two women engaging in oral sex and the depiction of a woman masturbating that offended Grasso more than the acts themselves.
Eventually, his protest became a trending topic on Facebook and a national debate.
Grasso said he believed the selection process for the summer reading book discriminated against religious people.
“They talk a lot about challenging ideas and challenging beliefs at orientation, but really the only people who are challenged here are religious people,” he said.
Frank Baumgartner, a UNC political science professor and the chairman of UNC’s summer reading selection board, disagrees with Grasso.
“There’s a list of all the previous books that have been used, and a lot of them are not like ‘The Cat in the Hat,’” he said.
“They’re going be books that are going to push some buttons and make people think. Whenever you do that, you’re going to have some people who are displeased.”