As mental health funding continues to shrink, some worry North Carolina might see broad and negative consequences.
N.C. Rep. Verla Insko, D-Orange, said the overall lack of spending on Medicaid expansion hurts North Carolina in the long term. Without accessible health services — both mental and physical — the state will ultimately spend more on emergency healthcare and other reactionary measures.
“If we had expanded Medicaid in 2014, the federal government would be paying 100 percent of the cost," Insko said. "North Carolinians would pay nothing, so we would bring millions to the state; it would cover everybody.”
In reality, Insko said current cuts to mental health services and to Medicaid will continue to cost North Carolina taxpayers in the future.
“It’s not smart," she said. "It’s the short-term decisions that are impacting our long-term viability.”
Ernestine Briggs-King, a psychiatry and behavioral sciences professor at Duke University, said she is disappointed with a trend of decreased funding for mental health services in the state — particularly for children.
"It's kind of shortsighted to deny (children) the care that they need now," she said. "I think the costs are probably even greater in the long run, but it's kind of like you pay now or you pay later."
Darcy Gruttadaro, director of the Child and Adolescent Action Center at the National Alliance on Mental Illness, said the stakes are extremely high for the state and children who do not receive adequate health services.
Children with mental health conditions are among the likeliest to drop out of schools, as well as become incarcerated, she said.