The Board of Governors met in closed session for two hours Jan. 16 before announcing Ross’ resignation, who clarified in a press conference he wasn’t going willingly.
“When I came here, I made it clear that I wouldn’t be ready to stop working at age 65, and I’m not ready to stop working at age 65,” Ross said at the time. “I wasn’t planning on leaving in the near future.”
Students and faculty alike questioned the board for the abrupt decision, with both meeting in the weeks following to discuss a response.
A search committee was formed in the spring, comprised entirely of board members. Students, faculty and chancellors were expected to contribute through the leadership statement committee.
“It was very candid, it was very passionate, it was very thoughtful. It was really what we needed to hear,” said Joan MacNeill, a board member and chair of the search committee.
Many urged transparency in the board, both during the search and regarding the reasons behind Ross’ dismissal.
The legislature stepped in Sept. 28, passing an amendment requiring the board to consider at least three finalists for the president’s job.
“It’s kind of embarrassing that it would take legislative action to require that level of transparency,” board member Marty Kotis said. “We should be requiring that of ourselves.”