David Trusty, spokesperson for Piedmont Natural Gas, said the merger — originally announced in October 2015 — was an exciting step for the company.
“From the Piedmont side, this is an amazing combination for us because, obviously, we are going into a much larger energy company,” he said. “So the resources that will be available and the types of practices and technology that Duke can bring to the table to help us leverage our product and our service is going to take us further than we would have been on our own.”
Tom Williams, spokesperson for Duke Energy, said they wanted to invest in pipelines because gas infrastructure needs to be built up to meet demand.
He said overall, the deal moved smoothly despite some criticism.
In a statement NC WARN released alongside the North Carolina Housing Coalition and The Climate Times, the groups said they saw four major issues with the way the merger proceeded, including the likelihood of leakage from natural gas infrastructure and financial risks associated with Duke Energy becoming more invested in the natural gas industry.
Jim Warren, executive director of NC WARN, said the deal between Piedmont Natural Gas and Duke Energy was a result of regulators being far too cozy with the two companies.
“The three things that really stick out is a terribly flawed, even rigged, process that allowed the utilities and the regulators to cut a backroom deal before the public or other parties even had a look at the project,” he said.
Warren said the other two objections the nonprofit holds are centered around environmental issues like the methane being released from gas companies possibly being a factor in a three-year period of global flooding. He said the deal may also lead to further reliance on fossil fuels.