CORRECTION: A previous version of this story misstated the purpose of the appeal. Brewer and SPG were previously denied a special use permit, but were later granted a permit to build a barn. Orange County residents were appealing the granting of this permit. The story has been updated to reflect this change. The Daily Tar Heel apologizes for the error.
Monday night, Orange County residents gathered in Hillsborough to hear an appeal by residents for building permit for Kara Brewer and Southeast Property Group, LLC granted in June.
Brewer and SPG applied for a special use permit to construct the Barn of Chapel Hill in 2015, a $735,000 event space for weddings and corporate events. The proposed site is an undeveloped, wooded 22-acre property on Morrow and Millikan Roads in southwest Orange County.
This application was denied, but Brewer and SPG were granted a building permit in June 2016.
Laura Streitfeld, executive director of Preserve Rural Orange, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting watershed land and farms in Orange County, is not in favor of the event space.
“Southwest Orange County is a rural agricultural zone and the farms in this community have been here since before there was a United States and these heritage farms, at great sacrifice, have kept their property agricultural,” she said. “To put a commercial venue for weddings and corporate events in the midst of genuinely agricultural and residential properties is incompatible.”
In November 2015, the Board of Adjustment unanimously denied Brewer’s application for a special use permit, said Streitfeld.
Streitfeld said that in June, after the Brewer and SPG changed the application from event center for weddings to barn, they were granted the building permit.
“The Board of Adjustment noted that it was an extraordinary community that would experience negative impacts on adjacent farms, livestock and horses, and will create hazards for adjacent property owners,” Streitfeld said. “Farmers are very concerned that this rural community would be disturbed and it would be a very incompatible use of this commercial property in an agriculture-residential zone.”