Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) sprinted across the screen, blue coattails flying and wand raised aloft. His suitcase was in his other hand, the worn brown leather thumping into his leg and threatening to throw him off balance with every step.
Scamander spent a large portion of "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" running, but as he ran, wind blowing his hair in every direction, he somehow managed to run right into the hearts of the audience. Scamander’s pigeon-toed stance, shy hesitance and soft voice were all somehow endearing, and he led the audience through a movie that was both enchanting and well-designed.
"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" was — dare I say it? Fantastic. Brilliant, as the British would say.
In passing, most people have referred to Fantastic Beasts as “the new Harry Potter” movie, expecting a spin-off that looks and feels like the eight-part movie series chronicling Harry Potter and his fight against dark magic.
Fantastic Beasts wasn’t Harry Potter, though. It was entirely different in a way that was fresh and exciting and gave new life to J.K. Rowling’s world of wizardry. It was Rowling’s screenwriting debut, and together with director David Yates, a new world in a 1926 New York City was born.
The story follows Newt Scamander, the wizarding equivalent of a zoologist and the soon-to-be author of "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them," a textbook read by Harry Potter himself 70 years after the movie takes place.
Scamander arrives in New York City after traveling around the world studying and collecting magical creatures. After a run-in with a bumbling, non-magical citizen, Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler), a few of these creatures escape his suitcase to cause chaos in the city.
Kowalski and Scamander, along with wizarding sisters Porpentina Goldstein (Katherine Waterston) and Queenie (Alison Sudol), spend the majority of the first half of the movie getting to know each other and humorously whisking around the city to collect the missing creatures.