According to the Charlotte mayor’s office, protestors gathered outside CMPD headquarters after the announcement and were generally peaceful. Four people were arrested for obstruction of traffic.
Murray’s report said Scott exited his vehicle with a loaded gun, and did not respond to officer commands to drop the weapon.
“A police officer — or any other person — is justified using deadly force if he reasonably believed, and in fact believed, that he or another person was in imminent danger of great bodily injury or death,” Murray said in his report.
Jeffrey Welty, an associate professor in the UNC School of Government, said despite initial confusion, evidence in the end was clear.
“When the initial narrative was law enforcement shoots an unarmed guy and then several pieces of evidence come together to suggest pretty strongly that he was armed, that makes a big difference, I think, in the outcome,” he said.
Charles Monnett, an attorney representing Scott’s family, said they are disappointed with the decision, and will explore a wrongful death case in civil court, potentially against the city, CMPD and Vinson.
“If you prevail in a civil case you receive monetary damages so it would help them financially, and then I think it would certainly help with their sense that at least partial justice has been done in that the civil justice system recognized that his life was wrongly taken,” Monnett said.