What happened?
Members of the forum debated whether or not it was necessary to change the wording used when talking about housekeepers employed by the University. They decided not to pursue any policy change in regards to the terminology. They also heard an announcement about the amount of money raised by the University’s charity organizations.
Who spoke?
The forum focused on the use of the term “housekeeping” to describe the janitorial division of the University.
Some members of the forum raised the issue that the term might be inherently negative and derogatory toward the employees of the department. Head of housekeeping Herb Richmond defended the use of the term to describe his workers. He said he believes it gives his staff a sense of purpose, if not pride.
“There’s doctors, administrators, all positions have a title,” he said, “Whatever the name is, I’m the one you call when the restroom’s broken. I’m the one you call when someone needs to come and clean the toilet. All the nasty, disgusting stuff I do, I’m proud of what I do and I tell people I’m not the director, I’m a housekeeper.”
Ricky Roach, a representative from Energy Services, agreed with Richmond.
“I don’t know why in the last 20 years it seems like people have decided that changing the name of a condition somehow changes the condition itself,” he said. “There’s no shame in being called a housekeeper. It’s a job”.