Emil Kang, the special assistant to the chancellor for the arts, said administrators are working to make arts a part of everyday life by continuing the momentum generated by Arts Everywhere Day.
“It’s my belief in particular — and the chancellor shares this — that we should be fostering a similar culture in the arts, so that the arts are not just for arts majors but for every kind of student,” Kang said.
In the future, Arts Everywhere will include initiatives like interdisciplinary learning with arts and non-arts subjects. Kang hopes an artistic equivalent to LFIT will become a general education requirement.
Kang said the goal of Arts Everywhere is to increase the artistic engagement of non-arts students, rather than to expand the arts departments or increase the number of arts majors. He thinks increasing the appreciation of arts across campus will lead to more resources for the arts departments.
Some people have concerns about the plans for Arts Everywhere.
Art history professor Cary Levine said he supports initiatives like Arts Everywhere, but he hopes the artistic engagement of non-arts students won’t be fulfilled at the expense of the arts departments.
“I kind of agree in a theoretical sense that when you do exciting things, more resources will come,” Levine said. “But it would be a terrible irony if the University was investing in public art that is on display and gets a lot of publicity, and yet drains the funds out of the arts department.”
Elin O’Hara Slavick, a studio arts professor, questioned why there was money for initiatives like these, rather than money for departmental needs.