The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Wednesday, Dec. 25, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

With the death of 20-year-old Matthew Ellis last week, Texas State University became the most recent setting for Greek-related tragedy. Now, the torches are lit and pitchforks are raised for a march to fraternity rows across the country. New York Times columnist Frank Bruni, among others, has called for fraternities to be banned by universities wherever possible in response to such alcohol-related fatalities (and other sins). 

I’m sympathetic with Bruni’s stance, but I fear that once our righteous procession reaches the shadow of the frat-house, we’ll be countered with a simple: “Who do you know here?”

The answer to that fundamental fraternity question gets at Greek life’s one proven benefit. 

Forget the hazing for a moment, forget the de facto racial and the de jure gender segregation, set aside the relatively astronomical sexual assault rates surrounding Greek life — and focus on this: to know a fraternity or sorority member is to know someone who will be, on average, happier than others you will meet. 

According to survey data collected by Gallup in 2014, “fraternity and sorority members are more likely than all other college graduates to be thriving in each of the five elements of well-being (purpose, social, financial, community, and physical).” 

This data only proves correlation, not causation, but that’s probably the best we will get until someone randomizes college first-years into Greek or independent life and waits for the results.  

In any case, it’s pretty plausible that Greek life is the variable that’s leading to these positive outcomes down the road. Work from psychologists Martin Seligman and Ed Diener in 2002 correlated stronger social connections with individual happiness, and Greek life seems to facilitate such bond formation. 

Author Michael Chabon wrote that a friendship between any two men springs from each one’s quixotic willingness to “polish the shaving-bowl helmet, climb on his donkey and ride off after the other in pursuit of illusive glory and questionable adventure.”

That rings true for me, and reminds me of a description of frat house life that a fraternity member acquaintance gave me once: At any time of day and night, for any activity from smoking pot to writing poetry, he said, he always had at least five companions happy to join him. 

Squaring this positive facet of fraternity life with its many darker ones has made me face an uncomfortable truth — what might be good for an individual, in this case the social wealth of fraternity life, may be detrimental to that individual’s community. 

It also makes me wonder if it’s possible to spare the best parts of Greek life while excising the worst fraternity excesses. Can we engineer social thriving in universities without condoning the sticky wood floors and sexual assault? 

I think we can, and doing so will involve taking some of the best features of Greek life and turning them to good use. That means encouraging more communal living among students, and more focus on festive spirit (the kind that makes Fraternity Court the most well-decorated square acreage in Chapel Hill during wintertime). It also means supporting productive group bonding ordeals like litter pickup to replace the shared agony of alcohol poisoning.

Universities should pull their sanction from fraternities — while remembering to value fraternity’s importance to their students.

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.