A lawsuit was filed Oct. 16 against the N.C. Department of Public Safety to challenge the state’s use of solitary confinement.
The American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina and North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services filed the complaint in state Superior Court on behalf of four men who are being held in restrictive housing.
The lawsuit said due to the psychological and physiological harm that comes to inmates who are held in solitary confinement, the practice is a cruel punishment that violates the state constitution.
The plaintiffs are seeking to represent all current and future people held in DPS custody. They are suing for declaratory and injunctive relief, which means the court would say the practice is unconstitutional and reduce its use.
If successful, this lawsuit could dramatically change the practices involving solitary confinement in North Carolina.
The four plaintiffs claim to have been held in solitary confinement for extended periods of time, according to the lawsuit. Rocky Dewalt has spent more than 12 years in solitary confinement during the 13 years he has been incarcerated. He has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, antisocial personality disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and chronic hypertension.
Robert Parham, who has been in DPS custody since 2008, has spent 10 years in solitary confinement. He has been diagnosed with depressive disorder, impulse control disorder and antisocial personality disorder. Shawn Bonnet has also spent nearly a decade in solitary confinement after entering DPS custody in 1996. The fourth plaintiff, Anthony McGee, has been held in solitary confinement for over a year.
Among the chief complaints made in the lawsuit are the standards by which prison staff decide to place a person in what DPS refers to as restrictive housing.
Mike Meno, communications director for the ACLU of North Carolina, said despite what people may think, the reasons for placing a person in solitary confinement can be a low threshold. He said the ACLU believes the practice should be drastically reduced and used only as a last resort to eliminate a safety threat.