Even a pandemic hasn't stopped player empowerment from emerging as a top priority for college athletes this year. From Pac-12 athletes banding together in the #WeAreUnited movement to try to distribute revenue to players to Oklahoma State football players threatening to boycott because head coach Mike Gundy donned a One America News Network shirt, there have been examples all over the country.
That conversation about the NCAA's definition of amateurism and players' rights resurfaced on Twitter earlier this week when UNC men's basketball players Armando Bacot and Garrison Brooks shared their thoughts about the University's decision to send on-campus students home after just one week of classes.
After the news broke, Bacot took to Twitter to pose the question "Student-athletes? Amateurism?? Or employee ?" as a possible reason why college athletes are remaining on campus and receiving different safety protocols compared to regular students when it comes to handling COVID-19.
Brooks echoed Bacot's sentiment on social media, quote-tweeting a message about UNC sending students home with his own "Finesse 101" comment after questioning what made it safe for student-athletes to remain on campus.
Bacot and Brooks declined to be interviewed for this story.
“The student-athletes don’t have to agree with the athletic department every time they make a statement," Steve Kirschner, senior associate athletic director for communications at UNC, said.