Last Thursday, I attended an online event titled, “What is CHALT?”
The event, hosted by the Chapel Hill Alliance for a Livable Town, otherwise known as CHALT, featured members of the organization speaking about a variety of topics. The discussion delved into smart growth, transportation planning and storm water management.
The organization decided to host the event because they have been the subject of several recent articles by local news outlets — including the News and Observer, IndyWeek and even the high school paper East Chapel Hill Observer (ECHO). Each of those articles was critical of the organization’s role in town politics, calling them “the epitome of moderate liberalism,” who prioritize the preservation of the past.
ECHO co-editor-in-chief, Caroline Chen, got the idea to write the article “How CHALT chokes authentic progress in Chapel Hill” when she saw a door hanger announcing CHALT’s endorsements for Chapel Hill Town Council.
The flyer featured scenic pictures of the Town, and stated that CHALT was committed to taking bold action against climate change, encouraging responsible development and providing a mix of housing.
“That’s literally antithetical to everything I’ve known about their organization,” Chen said. “Everything I’ve heard about them — I know this is not what they do. It’s important to let some people know that not everything is how it looks on paper and CHALT is one such thing.”
Her article clearly outlines CHALT's dissonance in their definition of "livability."
So, CHALT wanted to set the record straight.
“You keep hearing about CHALT ... find out who we are and what we do,” they said in a promotional flyer of the event. “Since 2014, CHALT has made a track record for advocating for transparent local government, responsive elected leaders and a greener, more livable Chapel Hill.”