The United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina ruled on Oct. 18 in favor of UNC continuing to use affirmative action as a part of its admissions process.
This ruling rejected the argument of Students for Fair Admissions, a nonprofit membership group and plaintiff of the case, that challenged the constitutionality of factoring race into admissions.
SFFA’s federal lawsuit said UNC was violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, under the guise of diversity, on two fronts.
The lawsuit said UNC’s “racial preference” for underrepresented minority students was a fixed feature on those students’ applications. It also said there were non-race-based criteria that could instead be applied to admissions, such as socioeconomic status.
The lawsuit discussed identifying race or ethnicity as a defining feature in the admissions process.
"Only using race or ethnicity as a dominant factor in admissions decisions could, for example, account for the disparate treatment of high-achieving Asian American and white applicants and underrepresented minority applicants with inferior academic credentials," the lawsuit said.
Beth Keith, associate vice chancellor of University communications, said in an email statement that the ruling made it clear that UNC’s admissions process is holistic and lawful.
“We evaluate each student in a deliberate and thoughtful way, appreciating individual strengths, talents and contributions to a vibrant campus community where students from all backgrounds can excel and thrive,” Keith said.
Timeline of SFFA v. UNC