Imagine you’re in an old western duel. You don’t think duels should be a thing, but in order to stop them going forward, you need to survive that duel.
What the Democrats are doing by giving up gerrymandering in the states they control is like taking the bullets out of your gun. It won’t end the duel. It will end with you shot and the other guy taking your stuff and laughing at your defeat.
Gerrymandering isn't a good thing, but it is necessary for its own demise.
That's the take. You can stop reading now, but if you do, please don’t yell at me on Twitter. I will start crying.
Still reading? Cool, love you.
First, what is gerrymandering? To that, I suggest you take a political science class. But, in short, it's when map makers (normally state legislators) draw legislative districting maps so that their party gets an advantage.
There are a lot of fun ways to do it, and having new technology and voting data means both parties have gotten incredibly good at it. In North Carolina, the map that the GOP almost passed created three blue districts, 10 red districts and one toss-up district, which they accomplished by splitting every major urban area in the state – other than Asheville and Durham – into multiple districts.
To reiterate, this wasn’t a proposed map, it was the confirmed map. It was state law until the North Carolina Supreme Court struck it down in a party-line vote — a map that gave the roughly 36 percent of voters that are registered as Democrats, at best, 20 percent of the representation.
Democrats gerrymander, too. They tried to get a nightmarish map passed in New York that would have given them a 22-to-4 seat advantage, and they passed a really impressive map in Illinois.