The Ackland Art Museum is currently in the process of formally acquiring two works of art by Nadya Tolokonnikova, a founder of the feminist performance art collective Pussy Riot known for advocating against Russian President Vladimir Putin's leadership.
The museum’s Acquisitions and Loans Committee, which is made up of five members, decided to acquire the pieces after a rare vote on Feb. 21. The results of the vote were three members in favor, one abstaining and one against.
One of the pieces is a short film created by Tolokonnikova, which was filmed in the United States.
In the video, individuals anonymously don balaclavas and burn a 10-foot by 10-foot portrait of Putin, using shivs forged out of jail bars to put the ashes into vials. The other artwork is a multimedia piece that contains one of the vials holding the portrait's ashes.
Tolokonnikova gained publicity after she participated in an anti-Putin protest concert in a Moscow cathedral in 2012, performing a “Punk Prayer” with Pussy Riot. Three members were convicted of hooliganism following the performance. Tolokonnikova and one other member served about two years in a Siberian prison labor camp after starting a hunger strike in prison protesting the conditions.
Peter Nisbet, the deputy director for curatorial affairs at the Ackland, said in a statement that the museum’s monthly meeting included a spirited discussion about the potential acquisition of Tolokonnikova’s works, which are a part of her “Putin’s Ashes” collection.
“There was concern that perhaps the performance glorifies violence or suggests a tacit support of a physical attack on world leaders,” Lauren Turner, the associate curator for contemporary art and special projects at the Ackland, said in an email statement to The Daily Tar Heel. “I am glad these concerns were voiced and discussed; as a museum, it is crucial that we consider how our own actions may impact a wide array of audiences.”
Nisbet said that the committee usually does not vote formally because a consensus is typically established before meetings.
He said the vote is purely advisory, because the final decision on all acquisitions is always made by the director, who then endorses the acquisition.